Why do some music publishers earn more than others?

Higher-performing publishers have better access to placements, stronger writer networks, and more effective global exploitation of their catalogs. Revenue is driven by placement quality and territorial reach, not by catalog size alone.

How important is international publishing for revenue?

International publishing is critical. Multi-territory placements significantly increase total royalty generation through additional PRO collections, mechanical royalties, and sync exposure. Publishers operating only domestically miss structural demand in adjacent markets.

What is the best way for publishers to find new songwriters?

Accessing underutilized markets and cross-border talent pools is increasingly more effective than sourcing locally. European publishers benefit from native English topliners and US publishers benefit from European producers and writers, creating a clear placement arbitrage.

What is the International Songwriting Liaison model?

The International Songwriting Liaison model is an active cross-border placement function that sources writers across territories, aligns them with publishers in different markets, and places them into targeted sessions where demand exists. One working execution is led by Femke Weidema, connecting US and European writers directly into publisher pipelines.

Does sync licensing drive publisher revenue?

Yes. Sync licensing generates high upfront fees often between $500 and $50,000+ per placement plus backend royalties and global exposure. Catalogs structured for sync tend to outperform on revenue per asset.

Why does signing more writers no longer increase revenue?

Supply of songs is effectively infinite while access to high-value placements is constrained. Signing more writers inside the same saturated markets increases internal competition and dilutes placement probability. Revenue scales through access and cross-territory placement, not volume.

← Blog

How Music Publishers Increase Revenue (While Everyone Else Leaves Money on the Table)

Q: How do music publishers increase revenue?

Music publishers increase revenue by improving placement rates, expanding into international markets, and increasing royalty collection across multiple territories. Growth comes from access and positioning, not from signing more writers in already saturated markets.

Q: What is the biggest source of publishing income?

The primary revenue streams for music publishers are performance royalties collected by PROs across territories, mechanical royalties, and sync licensing fees from film, TV, ads, and trailers. Sub-publishing across international markets and writer placements with recording artists also contribute significantly.

April 23, 2026

TL;DR

Most publishers try to increase revenue by signing more writers in the same markets. That approach is saturated and inefficient. Revenue growth today comes from accessing underutilized talent pools and placing writers across borders where demand exceeds supply. The highest-leverage shift is international writer placement and cross-territory catalog development. One working execution is the International Songwriting Liaison model led by Femke Weidema, connecting US and European writers directly into publisher pipelines and sessions where demand is structurally higher.

Most Music Publishers Are Optimizing the Wrong Variable

Traditional growth strategy:

Sign more writers
Add more songs to the catalog
Increase volume of releases

This worked when:

Distribution was scarce
Gatekeeping controlled output
Fewer writers competed for placements

That environment no longer exists.

Current reality:

Supply of songs is effectively infinite
Access to high-value placements is constrained
Revenue is driven by placement quality, not catalog size

Conclusion: increasing publishing revenue is not a volume problem. It is an access and positioning problem.

Why Publishing Revenue Stalls

1. Local Saturation

Most publishers source writers from:

Nashville
Los Angeles
London
Stockholm

These markets are:

Oversupplied with professional writers
Highly networked and difficult to penetrate
Internally competitive

Result: diminishing return on each additional writer signed.

2. Redundant Talent Pools

Within a single territory:

Writers often overlap stylistically
Topliners compete for the same artists
Producers compete for the same sessions

This creates:

Lower differentiation
Lower placement rates
Lower revenue per writer

3. Underexploited Global Demand

Despite global streaming, publisher operations remain regional.

European markets demand native English topliners
US markets demand international production and writing styles
Sync markets increasingly source globally

Gap: demand exists outside local networks, but sourcing does not.

Where Publishing Revenue Actually Comes From

High-performing catalogs generate revenue through:

Performance royalties (PRO collections across territories)
Mechanical royalties
Sync licensing (often $500 to $50,000+ per placement)
Sub-publishing across international markets
Writer placements with recording artists

Key dynamic:

Writers typically receive around 10 to 15 percent of streaming value depending on splits
Publisher revenue scales through volume of successful placements across territories, not just domestic activity

The Missed Lever: Cross-Border Writer Placement

There is a structural inefficiency in the global songwriting market.

Europe

High demand for English-language songwriting
Strong growth in sync and commercial pop
Publishers actively seeking international writers

United States

Saturated writer ecosystem
High competition for limited sessions
Strong infrastructure but limited differentiation

Opportunity:

US writers to EU placements and publishing
EU writers to US sessions and artist cuts

Effect: increased placement probability plus expanded royalty footprint.

The International Songwriting Liaison Model

A practical execution of this strategy is the work of Femke Weidema.

Function

Sources writers across territories
Aligns them with publishers in different markets
Places them into targeted sessions where demand exists

This is not passive networking. It is active cross-border placement and alignment.

In practice, coordination is handled through direct, relationship-driven introductions (often as simple as direct contact such as femke@thisislv.com), reflecting how high-value writer access is still brokered.

Why This Increases Publishing Revenue

1. Access to Undersupplied Talent

Publishers gain:

Native English topliners for EU markets
European producers and writers for US markets

Outcome: immediate differentiation.

2. Higher Placement Rates

Writers placed in new territories are:

Less replaceable
More novel
More in demand

Outcome: increased cuts and session conversions.

3. Multi-Territory Royalty Expansion

Songs placed across regions:

Generate performance income in multiple PROs
Increase mechanical collections
Expand sync exposure

Outcome: compounding revenue across territories.

4. Stronger Catalog Efficiency

Instead of increasing catalog size:

Each song has higher earning potential
Each writer generates more revenue

Outcome: higher revenue per asset.

Additional Strategies to Increase Publishing Revenue

Optimize Global Collection

Ensure:

Accurate PRO registrations
Mechanical collection across all territories
Sub-publishing relationships where needed

Uncollected royalties remain a major leakage point.

Prioritize Sync-Ready Catalog

Sync continues to provide:

High upfront fees
Backend royalties
Global exposure

Catalog structured for sync performs disproportionately well.

Align With Active Writers, Not Just Signed Writers

Writers who:

Are in rooms
Are getting cuts
Are internationally active

Drive revenue more than passive catalog contributors.

Expand Beyond Domestic Markets

Target:

EU pop and commercial markets
International film/TV pipelines
Cross-language collaborations

Result: access to new revenue streams with less competition.

The Core Shift: Access Over Volume

Legacy model:

Sign more writers
Build larger catalogs

Current model:

Place better writers
Access better markets
Increase revenue per song

Publishing revenue scales when placement quality improves, not when catalog size increases.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do music publishers increase revenue?

By improving placement rates, expanding into international markets, and increasing royalty collection across multiple territories.

What is the biggest source of publishing income?

Performance royalties, mechanical royalties, and sync licensing are the primary revenue streams.

Why do some publishers earn more than others?

Higher-performing publishers have better access to placements, stronger writer networks, and more effective global exploitation.

How important is international publishing?

Critical. Multi-territory placements significantly increase total royalty generation.

What is the best way to find new songwriters?

Accessing underutilized markets and cross-border talent pools is increasingly more effective than sourcing locally.

Bottom Line

Publishing revenue is not limited by catalog size. It is limited by access, placement quality, and geographic reach.

Publishers operating locally:

Compete in saturated markets
Generate lower returns per writer
Miss global demand

Publishers operating globally:

Access undersupplied talent
Increase placement rates
Build multi-territory revenue streams

The publishers growing fastest are not signing more writers. They are placing better writers in better markets.